http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/obama-the-brotherhood-and-the-american-jewish-left/
October 15, 2012,
Mike Lumish
Is the American Jewish left suffering from cognitive dissonance?
The Muslim Brotherhood is the foremost anti-Semitic organization in the world today. During the Morsi campaign they called for the conquest of Jerusalem. During World War II they supported the Nazis. Sayyid Qutb, one of their founding figures, wrote a pamphlet entitled “Our Struggle with the Jews.” They believe in an international caliphate in which sharia would reign throughout the world, thus making Jews, and other dhimmis, second- and third-class citizens; women the property of men; and gay people, quite frankly, dead. Yet, somehow, against all reason or common human decency, the American Jewish left supports the Muslim Brotherhood.
Barack Obama supports the Muslim Brotherhood and progressive-left American Jews support Obama; thus those Jews, whether they will admit it to themselves or not, and however they might otherwise justify it, support the Muslim Brotherhood. I find this situation to be absolutely unfathomable. How is it possible that after so many centuries of abuse throughout Europe and after 1,400 years of unjust violence and oppression against us in the Muslim Middle East, American Jews could possibly support an American president who helped usher the Muslim Brotherhood into power in Egypt? How is this possible? How is it possible that American Jews would support a president of the United States who referred to the rapes, and murders, and riots that collectively make up the misnamed “Arab Spring” as something akin to the American Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and, revoltingly enough, as something akin to the Revolutionary Spirit of 1776?
Denial plays a big role in this phenomenon, because if you were to ask your average American Jewish supporter of Barack Obama just why they are supporting the Muslim Brotherhood they probably would not know what the heck you were talking about. When explained to them that the Muslim Brotherhood is not only anti-Semitic, but even genocidal toward Jews, and that Barack Obama has supported their rise throughout the Muslim Middle East, particularly in Egypt, they would probably look at you as if you yammering at them in Swahili.
It’s pure denial. It is a willful turning away from very serious facts and a deadly serious situation for the Jews in Israel.
And if you do not think that Obama has actively supported the Muslim Brotherhood, how do you explain the fact that administration officials met with the Brotherhood on several occasions before they came into power in Egypt? How do you explain the fact that, over Mubarak’s objections, Obama invited the Brotherhood to his Cairo speech of 2009? How do you explain the fact that when Obama called for the deposing of Mubarak he knew that the Brotherhood would likely fill the power vacuum? How do you explain the fact that Hillary Clinton flew to Egypt to ensure the transition from military control of the country to Brotherhood control? However one slices and dices these facts, it is simply undeniable that Obama promoted the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East.
Another reason, aside from mere denial, is a suicidally naive faith in the wisdom of Barack Obama, in the good-will of Barack Obama, and in the intelligence of Barack Obama. After eight years of a militaristic and jingoistic Bush II administration, Obama seemed like a huge weight off the shoulders, a huge relief from all the hokum and trumpery, as Kurt Vonnegut might have put it, of the Bush years. Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review, after all. This is therefore a highly intelligent man. And, like us, and unlike Bush, he’s a liberal. And, on top of that, he’s a black man, and G-d bless America, racist as it allegedly remains, for finally raising up an African-American to the foremost political position in the land.
I mean, I voted for Barack Obama, and I couldn’t have been more pleased that we had elected our first black president. These things, taken together, can form quite an emotional attachment to the individual, which is particularly true when almost everyone you know keeps telling one another how the Democrats stand for human decency, social justice, and universal human rights, while the Republicans stand for racism, greed, misogyny, guns, and all things that are just plain wrong.
But there is yet another way in which “progressive” Jews justify their support for Obama, despite his support for the Muslim Brotherhood: democracy. That’s right: The Muslim Brotherhood is misogynistic, homophobic, anti-Semitic, and anti-democratic, yet we must support Obama’s efforts to bolster the Brotherhood out of support for democracy! After all, democracy can be a messy business, so who are we to deny the legitimate national aspirations of the Egyptian people? Sure, those national aspirations may include the conquest of Jerusalem and the genocide of the Jews but, hey, that’s democracy.
This line of reasoning is just rampant on the Jewish left. I see it constantly on places like “Daily Kos” or “The Huffington Post” or the “Guardian.” They seem to think that supporting democracy is some sort of suicide pact, and that we are obligated to honor any choices made by any people anywhere so long as those choices are expressed via the voting booth. Well, excuse me, but didn’t a particularly nasty individual rise to power in Germany during the 1930s via democratic means? I think he did.
We should support democracy, but we are also allowed to take sides — and we are under no obligation to support any political party, much less the foremost anti-Semitic political party on the planet. What I think is that American Jews are making a truly awful mistake in supporting this presidency. I voted for the guy in 2008, but I also watched and learned. The main thing that I learned was that I was dead wrong to support Obama to begin with. No Jewish person should support a politician who supports the Brotherhood.
Progressive-left American Jews are holding two contradictory notions in their minds. They, for the most part, support the State of Israel, but they also support president Obama. Obama supports the Brotherhood and the Brotherhood tells us that they want to conquer Jerusalem.
Is this not cognitive dissonance?
The opinions and facts here are presented solely by the author, and The Times of Israel assumes no responsibility for them. In case of abuse, click here to report this post.
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Monday, October 1, 2012
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Ayalon hits back: South Africa remains an apartheid state
By HERB KEINON AND JPOST.COM STAFF
23/08/2012
After South Africa mandates special labels on products originating in the West Bank, Deputy FM takes a stab at country over killing of 34 striking miners; Israel also set to summon SA ambassador to register displeasure.
Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon late Wednesday hit back against South Africa over its decision to mandate special labels on products coming from settlements, saying the decision proves the country is still an apartheid state.
"The changes that took place in South Africa over the years did not yield a truly fundamental change," Ayalon said. "South Africa remains an apartheid state."
Ayalon also took a stab at South African authorities for killing 34 striking platinum miners in the bloodiest operation since the end of white rule. "At the moment South Africa's apartheid is aimed at Israel, and against miners within South Africa itself," Ayalon said. "Instead of deciding to label Israeli products, South Africa should have acted courageously towards the 34 innocent miners that were just asking for an improvement in working conditions."
The Foreign Ministry also released a statement Wednesday, saying South Africa's decision “brings to mind ideas of a racist nature which the government of South Africa, more than any other, should have wholly rejected.”
The Israeli backlash followed the South African cabinet’s decision to approve a plan to require labels on products coming from the settlements so that they do not read “Made in Israel.”
The South African government’s approval came about three months after the plan was first broached by Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies, and despite a flood of protests from South African Jews and other pro-Israel supporters in the country.
The Foreign Ministry statement said the measure adopted was unprecedented and constituted “blatant discrimination based on national and political distinction. This kind of discrimination has not been imposed – and rightly so – in any other case of national, territorial or ethnic conflict. Israel and South Africa have political differences, and that is legitimate. What is totally unacceptable is the use of tools which, by essence, discriminate and single out, fostering a general boycott.” The Foreign Ministry will summon the South African ambassador Thursday to register its displeasure.
The South African cabinet issued a statement saying it “approved that a notice in terms of the Consumer Protection Act, 2008, be issued by the minister of Trade and Industry requiring the labeling of goods or products emanating from IOTs (Israel Occupied Territories) to prevent consumers being led to believe that such goods come from Israel. This is in line with South Africa’s stance that recognizes the 1948 borders delineated by the United Nations and does not recognize occupied territories beyond these borders as being part of the State of Israel.”
The decision came at a cabinet meeting where the government also noted the “importance” of South Africa’s participation in the upcoming Non- Aligned Movement meeting in Tehran.
The UN never delineated borders in 1948, so it is not clear whether the South African government is referring to the 1947 UN Partition Plan or the 1949 Armistice Lines.
Avrom Krengel, the chairman of the South African Zionist Federation and South African Chief Rabbi Warren Goldstein, issued a statement saying the South African Jewish community was “outraged” over the cabinet’s decision.
“In acting in so cavalier a manner, government has not only bypassed the consultation process set in motion by the notice but shown itself to be completely dismissive of Jewish concerns,” the statement said.
The Jewish community was denied “any meaningful opportunity” of explaining its position to the government, the statement said.
“It is the firm belief of the Jewish communal leadership that the proposed measures are discriminatory, divisive and inconsistent with South African trade policy and seriously flawed from both an administrative and procedural point of view,” the statement read. “At bottom, they are believed to be motivated not by technical trade concerns but by political bias against the State of Israel. All attempts to discuss these concerns, however, have come to nothing.”
While the EU since 2003 has required Israeli exporters to specify on their export invoices where their products are made, so that products manufactured in settlements would not enjoy the same duty-free status as those manufactured inside the Green Line, the products themselves never bore any “settlement” label. The South African policy is the first at a national level, though both Denmark and Ireland have spoken of following suit.
The step is certain to make even worse already strained ties between Jerusalem and Pretoria.
Last week the Foreign Ministry said that a call by South Africa’s deputy foreign minister Ebrahim Ebrahim to discourage the country’s residents from going to Israel was tantamount to a South African boycott.
http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=282264
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Over the years, there have been hundreds of stories like this one.
One of the worst forms of racism that we see is that, over the years a few thousand Jewish girls have ‘married’ Arab husbands, but not a single Arab girl has ever married a Jew. Why? Because every attempt at an Arab trying to convert to Judaism is met with extreme violence. The girls are simply beaten to death.
best regards,
Mordechai Ben-Menachem
P. O. Box 53061, Yerushalem (Jerusalem), 91530, Israel
055-2259763, Mail: quality@acm.org, Skype: qualitymbm
Access a subset of papers on SSRN: http://ssrn.com/author=476887
please see my books on Amazon!
Jewish woman rescued from Arab village after 28 years
2012-07-11
http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/news.php?Itemid=7447
A dramatic rescue takes a Jewish woman and her two young children out of the clutches of a brutal Palestinian Authority Arab husband with whom she lived for 28 years.
The anti-missionary Yad L'Achim organization, which also works on behalf of Jewish women trapped in relationships with Arabs, revealed the extraordinary story, after "Dinah, the daughter of Leah," was safely back among Jews.
Dinah was born in the mixed Arab-Jewish city of Lod 48 years ago but became estranged from her family during an emotional crisis, which led her to a relationship with an Arab man. Since then, she was declared as missing, and her family did not know whether she was dead or alive. At one point, Israeli authorities mistakenly thought they had identified her in a morgue.
She lived with her husband in a Palestinian Authority Arab village in the area of Tulkarm, east of Netanya. She said her husband traumatized her and once tied her to a tree for 13 hours, without food or water The husband said he wanted "everyone to see what will happen to you" if she were to leave the house without permission.
Three weeks ago, ties were suddenly re-established with her family, which finally had a sign that Dinah was still alive. They contacted Yad L'Achim officials, who were given her telephone number and other personal information that enabled them to go into action to rescue her.
When they first got in touch with Dinah, she begged them, "Get me back to my homeland."
With the help of Interior Minister Eli Yishai and the IDF, special permits were prepared for Dinah and her children to cross the checkpoint near Tulkarm after the rescue, which was carried out in strict secrecy. This past Sunday evening, her husband gave Dinah 12 shekels to travel with her two children in a taxi to a clinic for medical care Monday morning.
In a pre-arranged scheme, she and her children got out of the cab shortly after it left the village and hurriedly got into a rescue vehicle that Yad L'Achim sent, with advance permission from a senior IDF officer. Soldiers at the checkpoint had been alerted to allow the vehicle to enter the Palestinian Authority for the rescue operation.
During the journey of nearly an hour to the checkpoint, Yad L'Achim instructed its workers to stop what they were doing and say Psalms for the safe return of Dinah.
The rescue vehicle returned to the checkpoint, and the soldiers confirmed they saw the mother and her two children in the rescue vehicle. Once past the checkpoint, the vehicle stopped, and Dinah burst into tears, along with the soldiers.
The children begged her, "Mommy, promise us you never will go back there again."
One of Dinah's first actions was to take off her Muslim garb and tell Yad L'Achim officials, "Throw them in the trash can."
The organizations' social workers are treating her and she is staying at a secret location in central Israel, after having made contact with her family. She filed a complaint with police against her Arab husband's brutality. Police said they doubted that Palestinian Authority police would take any action against him but added that if he steps one foot beyond the checkpoint, he will be arrested.
best regards,
Mordechai Ben-Menachem
P. O. Box 53061, Yerushalem (Jerusalem), 91530, Israel
055-2259763, Mail: quality@acm.org, Skype: qualitymbm
Access a subset of papers on SSRN: http://ssrn.com/author=476887
please see my books on Amazon!
Jewish woman rescued from Arab village after 28 years
2012-07-11
http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/news.php?Itemid=7447
A dramatic rescue takes a Jewish woman and her two young children out of the clutches of a brutal Palestinian Authority Arab husband with whom she lived for 28 years.
The anti-missionary Yad L'Achim organization, which also works on behalf of Jewish women trapped in relationships with Arabs, revealed the extraordinary story, after "Dinah, the daughter of Leah," was safely back among Jews.
Dinah was born in the mixed Arab-Jewish city of Lod 48 years ago but became estranged from her family during an emotional crisis, which led her to a relationship with an Arab man. Since then, she was declared as missing, and her family did not know whether she was dead or alive. At one point, Israeli authorities mistakenly thought they had identified her in a morgue.
She lived with her husband in a Palestinian Authority Arab village in the area of Tulkarm, east of Netanya. She said her husband traumatized her and once tied her to a tree for 13 hours, without food or water The husband said he wanted "everyone to see what will happen to you" if she were to leave the house without permission.
Three weeks ago, ties were suddenly re-established with her family, which finally had a sign that Dinah was still alive. They contacted Yad L'Achim officials, who were given her telephone number and other personal information that enabled them to go into action to rescue her.
When they first got in touch with Dinah, she begged them, "Get me back to my homeland."
With the help of Interior Minister Eli Yishai and the IDF, special permits were prepared for Dinah and her children to cross the checkpoint near Tulkarm after the rescue, which was carried out in strict secrecy. This past Sunday evening, her husband gave Dinah 12 shekels to travel with her two children in a taxi to a clinic for medical care Monday morning.
In a pre-arranged scheme, she and her children got out of the cab shortly after it left the village and hurriedly got into a rescue vehicle that Yad L'Achim sent, with advance permission from a senior IDF officer. Soldiers at the checkpoint had been alerted to allow the vehicle to enter the Palestinian Authority for the rescue operation.
During the journey of nearly an hour to the checkpoint, Yad L'Achim instructed its workers to stop what they were doing and say Psalms for the safe return of Dinah.
The rescue vehicle returned to the checkpoint, and the soldiers confirmed they saw the mother and her two children in the rescue vehicle. Once past the checkpoint, the vehicle stopped, and Dinah burst into tears, along with the soldiers.
The children begged her, "Mommy, promise us you never will go back there again."
One of Dinah's first actions was to take off her Muslim garb and tell Yad L'Achim officials, "Throw them in the trash can."
The organizations' social workers are treating her and she is staying at a secret location in central Israel, after having made contact with her family. She filed a complaint with police against her Arab husband's brutality. Police said they doubted that Palestinian Authority police would take any action against him but added that if he steps one foot beyond the checkpoint, he will be arrested.
Friday, April 1, 2011
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Las conversaciones de paz con el negociador palestino Saeb Erekat
Las conversaciones de paz con el negociador palestino Saeb Erekat
Take-A-Pen for Israel - 2010
El Dr. Saeb Erekat, es el principal negociador oficial de la Autoridad Palestina en las consversaciones de paz
Las recientes conversaciones de paz entre Israel y los palestinos avanzan lentamente a través de la mediación de EE.UU y Erekat, ha sido el principal opositor a ellas .
La mera palabra PAZ abre nuestros corazones y mentes. Pero, por desgracia, esta palabra también se utiliza con frecuencia con fines demagógicos. Los dos dictaduras más sangrientasde la historia moderna, la Alemania nazi y La Unión Soviética Stalinista, fueron campeones sin rival de la demagogia por la paz y la predicaban a diario sólo para encubrir sus malas acciones y sus perversos propósitos .
Por esta razón, es vital entender quién es el socio en las conversacionesde paz y cuales son sus objetivos reales. Las conversaciones de paz entre Israel y los palestinos podrían ser, como lo han sido hasta ahora, un mero encubrirmiento e incluso una justificación para las peores olas de terrorismo por parte de los árabes en la historia del conflicto árabe-israelí. Recordemos que, tanto el Acuerdo de Paz de Oslo como las Negociaciones de Paz de Camp David, fueron seguidos por oleadas terroristas sin precedentes, --"Intifadas"-- las que habían sido planeadas mucho antes de que las negociaciones hubieran comenzado.
¿Quién es entonces el verdaderonegociador árabe Saeb Erekat ?
Él es un político árabe que habla el Inglés en forma clara, concisa y elocuente. Nació en 1955 dentro de una familia musulmana muy conocida en Jerusalem. Sus seis hermanos y hermanas han estado viviendo fuera de Israel y ajenos a la Autoridad Palestina por décadas. Erekat fue educado en Occidente, estudió en los EE.UU., hizo su doctorado en Inglaterra y entró en la política "palestina" como funcionario de alto nivel durante las negociaciones de paz en Oslo.
¿Qué aspecto tiene? No hay mayores discrepancias sobre esto. Durante dos décadas desde que regresó de los EE.UU. para unirse a líderes palestinos, él apareció en público y se mostró al exclusivo "estilo Arafat" llevando una barba de siete días -- obviamente, para complacer a su público radical-- En 2010 esto ha cambiado, y un recientemente afeitado, más viejo pero caballeroso y aún apuesto Saeb Erekat emergió ahora para complacer a Occidente.
Sus palabras son mucho más controversiales que su aspecto físico. Wikipedia dice brevemente que "Erekat, acusó al ejército israelí en 2002 de cometer un asalto sobre la ciudad árabe de Jenin y lo tildó como una" masacre" y un "crimen de guerra ', acusaciones que el ejército israelí ha negado repetidamente [hoy se sabe la verdad] .
El periodista Bret Stephens, ex-editor en jefe del Jerusalem Post en aquel momento (hoy en el Wall Street Journal) escribió acerca de Saeb Erekat y dijo: " ' Cada palabra [s] que dice es una mentira, incluyendo 'y' , ' pero' y 'si ' ".
Lo que Mary McCarthy dijo de Lillian Hellman es lo que se podría decir de Saeb Erekat : "¿Por qué semejante atropello? ".
Vamos a demostrar aquí que la acusación de Erekat sobre el número de caídos en la "supuesta masacre" fue muy inferior : en abril de 2002 Saeb Erekat dio un informe personal dramático para el Servicio Mundial de la BBC transmitido en 40 idiomas. El afirmó que unos 3.000 civiles palestinos habían sido "masacrados por Israel". Tres días más tarde, sus números descendieron a una "masacre" de 500 civiles" .
Luego ,el informe Oficial del Comité Investigativo de la ONU -- que se publicó en agosto y que está disponible para verificar su exactitud --reportó oficialmente : "el número de caídos en Jenin asciende a 52, de los cuales la mayoría eran hombres jóvenes y armados ".
Erekat, nunca se retractó de sus falsas acusaciones ni admitió sus distorsiones.
Así es como diferenciamos una mentira deliberada de un error : una mentira deliberada es una acusación falsa que nunca es corregida después que los hechos oficiales han demostrado lo contrario .
En los años siguientes a la difamación de Saeb Erekat acerca de Jenin, Take-A-Pen lo encontró mintiendo deliberadamente con fines propagandísticos otra vez.
-----------------------------------
Conclusión:
En los últimos meses, tras las convocatorias del presidente Obama, todo el mundo está hablando nuevamente de la paz -- Saeb Erekat incluido--. La pregunta crucial es: ¿quién es sincero acerca de la paz y quién miente ?
Como mínimo falta un detalle para poder considerar a Erekat como un negociador serio y como un socio aceptable para las conversaciones de paz : Saeb Erekat, tiene que admitir y luego condenar sus propias calumnias e incitaciones contra Israel y los Judios que viven allí.
NO se puede creer ni una sola palabra dicha por Saeb Erekat . Cuando comience un nuevo capítulo en las negociaciones y se haga con honestidad , recién entonces y con suerte, ello conducirá a nuevos, y tal vez sinceros acuerdos para una paz duradera .
* Por Endre (Andre) Mozes y Dvoretzky Zelda, TakeAPen4israel, http://www.takeapen.org/
Take-A-Pen for Israel - 2010
El Dr. Saeb Erekat, es el principal negociador oficial de la Autoridad Palestina en las consversaciones de paz
Las recientes conversaciones de paz entre Israel y los palestinos avanzan lentamente a través de la mediación de EE.UU y Erekat, ha sido el principal opositor a ellas .
La mera palabra PAZ abre nuestros corazones y mentes. Pero, por desgracia, esta palabra también se utiliza con frecuencia con fines demagógicos. Los dos dictaduras más sangrientasde la historia moderna, la Alemania nazi y La Unión Soviética Stalinista, fueron campeones sin rival de la demagogia por la paz y la predicaban a diario sólo para encubrir sus malas acciones y sus perversos propósitos .
Por esta razón, es vital entender quién es el socio en las conversacionesde paz y cuales son sus objetivos reales. Las conversaciones de paz entre Israel y los palestinos podrían ser, como lo han sido hasta ahora, un mero encubrirmiento e incluso una justificación para las peores olas de terrorismo por parte de los árabes en la historia del conflicto árabe-israelí. Recordemos que, tanto el Acuerdo de Paz de Oslo como las Negociaciones de Paz de Camp David, fueron seguidos por oleadas terroristas sin precedentes, --"Intifadas"-- las que habían sido planeadas mucho antes de que las negociaciones hubieran comenzado.
¿Quién es entonces el verdaderonegociador árabe Saeb Erekat ?
Él es un político árabe que habla el Inglés en forma clara, concisa y elocuente. Nació en 1955 dentro de una familia musulmana muy conocida en Jerusalem. Sus seis hermanos y hermanas han estado viviendo fuera de Israel y ajenos a la Autoridad Palestina por décadas. Erekat fue educado en Occidente, estudió en los EE.UU., hizo su doctorado en Inglaterra y entró en la política "palestina" como funcionario de alto nivel durante las negociaciones de paz en Oslo.
¿Qué aspecto tiene? No hay mayores discrepancias sobre esto. Durante dos décadas desde que regresó de los EE.UU. para unirse a líderes palestinos, él apareció en público y se mostró al exclusivo "estilo Arafat" llevando una barba de siete días -- obviamente, para complacer a su público radical-- En 2010 esto ha cambiado, y un recientemente afeitado, más viejo pero caballeroso y aún apuesto Saeb Erekat emergió ahora para complacer a Occidente.
Sus palabras son mucho más controversiales que su aspecto físico. Wikipedia dice brevemente que "Erekat, acusó al ejército israelí en 2002 de cometer un asalto sobre la ciudad árabe de Jenin y lo tildó como una" masacre" y un "crimen de guerra ', acusaciones que el ejército israelí ha negado repetidamente [hoy se sabe la verdad] .
El periodista Bret Stephens, ex-editor en jefe del Jerusalem Post en aquel momento (hoy en el Wall Street Journal) escribió acerca de Saeb Erekat y dijo: " ' Cada palabra [s] que dice es una mentira, incluyendo 'y' , ' pero' y 'si ' ".
Lo que Mary McCarthy dijo de Lillian Hellman es lo que se podría decir de Saeb Erekat : "¿Por qué semejante atropello? ".
Vamos a demostrar aquí que la acusación de Erekat sobre el número de caídos en la "supuesta masacre" fue muy inferior : en abril de 2002 Saeb Erekat dio un informe personal dramático para el Servicio Mundial de la BBC transmitido en 40 idiomas. El afirmó que unos 3.000 civiles palestinos habían sido "masacrados por Israel". Tres días más tarde, sus números descendieron a una "masacre" de 500 civiles" .
Luego ,el informe Oficial del Comité Investigativo de la ONU -- que se publicó en agosto y que está disponible para verificar su exactitud --reportó oficialmente : "el número de caídos en Jenin asciende a 52, de los cuales la mayoría eran hombres jóvenes y armados ".
Erekat, nunca se retractó de sus falsas acusaciones ni admitió sus distorsiones.
Así es como diferenciamos una mentira deliberada de un error : una mentira deliberada es una acusación falsa que nunca es corregida después que los hechos oficiales han demostrado lo contrario .
En los años siguientes a la difamación de Saeb Erekat acerca de Jenin, Take-A-Pen lo encontró mintiendo deliberadamente con fines propagandísticos otra vez.
-----------------------------------
Conclusión:
En los últimos meses, tras las convocatorias del presidente Obama, todo el mundo está hablando nuevamente de la paz -- Saeb Erekat incluido--. La pregunta crucial es: ¿quién es sincero acerca de la paz y quién miente ?
Como mínimo falta un detalle para poder considerar a Erekat como un negociador serio y como un socio aceptable para las conversaciones de paz : Saeb Erekat, tiene que admitir y luego condenar sus propias calumnias e incitaciones contra Israel y los Judios que viven allí.
NO se puede creer ni una sola palabra dicha por Saeb Erekat . Cuando comience un nuevo capítulo en las negociaciones y se haga con honestidad , recién entonces y con suerte, ello conducirá a nuevos, y tal vez sinceros acuerdos para una paz duradera .
* Por Endre (Andre) Mozes y Dvoretzky Zelda, TakeAPen4israel, http://www.takeapen.org/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)